Moneyball famously highlighted the potential of data to propel sports teams towards success. The story of the Oakland Raiders is one of prodigious use of data and its power to overcome teams with much bigger budgets.
Since then, it’s rare for any professional sports team to underestimate the power of data, and to an extent it’s destroyed some of the romance of sport as the head rules the heart. A recent study set out to explore whether it has merit however, and especially whether the most highly paid football players in the world are worth their enormous salaries.
The researchers analyzed the salaries and performances of 6,082 professional football players using machine learning. Each player was analyzed according to 55 different attributes that were designed to reflect the skillset of the player. These included measurements related to performance (such as scoring and passing accuracy), behavior (such as aggression and vision), and abilities (such as speed, acceleration, and ball control). By combining the scores for each of these, the researchers believe they were able to accurately gauge what each player was worth in terms of salary, and by comparing them with their peers, whether they are worth it or not.
Worth the wage
The analysis produced some fascinating findings. Whilst it might be expected that Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo should be the best paid players in the world, the analysis found David De Gea and Mesut Oezil also very near the top of the tree.
Despite the positioning of Messi at the top of the tree however, the model believed a ‘fair’ salary for him would be roughly half what he currently earns, thus rendering him the most overpaid footballer in the world (according to the model). Next in the list of most overpaid players were Angel Di Maria, Robin Van Persie, Ivan Rakitic, and Nicolas Otamendi.
Suffice to say, the model does only look at performances on the pitch, so won’t take account of the commercial value of a player (the Beckham effect we could perhaps call it).
It did however, reveal a number of players who they believed were significantly underpaid, with Manchester City’s new signing Bernardo Silva top of the tree (based upon his salary at Monaco rather than his new one). Next in the list were Harry Kane, Granit Xhaka, Timo Horn, and Paco Alcacer.
What sets them apart
Interestingly, a number of attributes seemed common among those who were either underpaid or overpaid. For instance, underpaid players would often excel in areas such as agility, acceleration, speed, balance, and their ability to track the position of the other players.
Overpaid players, by contrast, only really seemed to exceed their peers in terms of their strength.
There were also some interesting distinctions between the leagues. For instance, vision was highly regarded in Germany, whereas finishing was popular in La Liga and tackling in Italy.
Despite there being some outliers however, most of the time there was a strong correlation between salary and skill level. Where inequalities exist however, the researchers suggest a negative impact upon player performance. The authors believe a better approach is to apply an objective quantitative method for determining salary baselines that all players are aware of, thus simplifying negotiations and providing a uniform salary scale.
