The repercussions of Brexit have presented a formidable challenge for British enterprises in their efforts to retain highly skilled migrants. A recent study conducted by Radboud University reveals that a significant proportion of these migrants are inclined to distance themselves from the United Kingdom, while others report no discernible impact.
Against the backdrop of a rising tide of populist sentiments against immigration witnessed across multiple nations, encompassing Brexit and the rhetoric espoused by President Trump in the United States, this research offers valuable insights for companies grappling with a substantial migrant workforce.
Migrant backlash
Focusing on self-initiated expatriates (SIEs), who are European individuals that voluntarily chose to relocate to the United Kingdom without specific job prospects, the study uncovers a profound influence exerted by the country’s decision to depart from the European Union.
The responses within this group displayed considerable variation, ranging from individuals experiencing emotional distress and contemplating departure, to those who expressed a lack of perceived impact on their circumstances.
“In our study, we found that there were two key elements that determined how European SIEs felt,” the researchers explain. “The group that identified with the U.K. before Brexit saw the vote as an identity threat. They had strongly negative reactions, with many leaving the U.K. literally or figuratively depending on their perceived mobility. Those identifying less with the U.K. had milder reactions, and largely planned to stay put.”
Identity is key
The initial group under scrutiny exhibited deeply emotional and personal reactions to the situation. Some individuals expressed sentiments such as, “If you reject me, I’ll reject you too. I have no need for you.”
Before Brexit, they had felt a sense of belonging within British society; however, afterward, they were dismayed at the prospect of being treated as foreigners. For some, the issue became intensely personal, leading one interviewee to confess that they felt compelled to support any football team opposing England as a form of resistance.
In contrast, those who identified less strongly with the United Kingdom found Brexit easier to accept. While they expressed concerns about the practical and financial implications for both themselves and the nation, they did not take it as a personal affront. The researchers assert that this study underscores the significance of how employers navigate societal and political backlash against migrant workers.
“Employees seek support from their employers. This entails not only providing practical assistance and updates for those directly affected but also sending a clear message to the entire workforce,” the authors conclude. “Non-migrant employees must be informed about the ongoing debate so that self-initiated expatriates (SIEs) do not feel excluded or burdened on their own. Companies are an integral part of society and bear the responsibility of ensuring that employees feel included if they wish to retain talented individuals.”
