Even negative blogs have a positive impact

Share this post

Seems quite counter-intuitive doesn't it? After all, we're told that people increasingly search the web for reviews and user opinions on products, so surely a negative blog post should really damage sales of a product?

New research suggests that might not be the case however.  The paper was co-authored by Rohit Aggarwal, assistant professor of Information Systems at the university’s David Eccles School of Business, and he notes that negative posts can act as a catalyst and can exponentially increase the readership of employee blogs.

This is because people visit corporate blogs expecting to see nothing but rosy testimonials and corporate speak about how great the company is.  A more realistic commentary therefore acts to boost the perceived integrity of both the employee and their employer.  It makes the company seem transparent and honest, which has positive implications for our perception of their products and services.

“There is some merit in allowing negative posts” by company blogging policy-setters, suggest Aggarwal and coauthors Ram Gopal and Ramesh Sankaranarayanan of the University of Connecticut and Param Vir Singh of Carnegie Mellon University. “Permitting a few negative posts to increase readership should be a good strategy.”
 
Suffice to say however that a stream of pure negativity is not good, there are clear limits on what is beneficial and what is not.
 
“We found that the optimal percentage for negative posts is about 15 percent to 20 percent,” Aggarwal says. “Beyond that, you may get more readership but there also is more negative impact on the company in terms of reputation and possibly sales.”
 
So, what does the research suggest for executives in the process of drafting, or re-writing their policies on blog content? In a word: vigilance.
 
“We are not advocating, for instance, that a firm should actively encourage its employees to post negative comments on their blogs. Firms may not choose to restrict certain types of negative posts, which is different from actually encouraging negative posts,” the paper states.
 
That said, Aggarwal adds that his research suggests that companies should be more open toward “allowing employees more freedom to write and freedom to express” even as they “track blogs to see what the ratio of negative posts is to positive ones.
 
A high negative-to-positive blog post ratio can also serve as a canary in a coal mine, allowing a company to proactively react to brewing discontent among employees. “If the (negative) ratio is too high, they can talk with those employees about their concerns. But while they should monitor those blogs, they should not stifle all criticism.”
 
All of which paints an interesting contrast to the traditional social media zeitgeist that sees companies terrified that employees will post things that will taint their image if they're let loose on social media.  This research suggests that far from discouraging such activities, the odd negative comment may actually do them some good.
 

7 thoughts on “Even negative blogs have a positive impact

  1. Now that is interesting. I wonder however if that only applies to blogs that the company writes itself? I mean if a 3rd party blog with no affiliation to the company or product I'm guessing that a negative review on that would have a much bigger and more damaging impact?

  2. Yeah I can see how that works. I suspect that most people are quite skeptical about what is produced on a companies website as they think it's marketing speak. So having the odd dissenting voice could work wonders for authenticity. Like Andrea though I doubt whether this would work as well on 3rd party sites.

  3. This also applies to customer feedback/comments/posts on a company's social media sites; Not only does it give the impression of a company that's believable, it also presents the opportunity to reply to that negativity with an expressed desire to help fix a problem. No company is perfect, and the sooner they acknowledge that, the better.

  4. There was a story on the BBC earlier in the week about the impact of negative reviews on TripAdvisor. I wonder how this research applies when the reviews are on 3rd party sites?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>